William Carlton Dart v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court should not assume jurisdiction under Kyne when there is a dispute over the factual findings only
• noting that facial challenges to agency action as allegedly \ 'in excess of authority' must not simply involve a dispute over statutory interpretation or challenged findings of fact.\
• stating that the Kyne standard is “narrow and rarely successfully invoked”
• “Nothing in the subsequent enactment of the APA altered the McAnnulty doctrine of review.”
• “If the wording of a preclusion clause is less than absolute, the presumption of judicial review also favors a particular category of plaintiffs’ claims.”
• “Leedom v. Kyne test ... has been alternatively phrased as whether the agency action ‘on its face’ violated a statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).