William C. Logan & Associates v. Leatherman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is irrelevant whether a contractor who failed to list a subcontractor for a specialty ultimately intended to obtain additional future bids in such a manner as to prevent the subcontractor’s bid from exceeding the threshold amount for listing
• “The chief procurement officer, after notice and a hearing, affirmed the award of the contract to Logan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).