William C. Chapman v. Orange Rice Milling Company, and Edward J. Stine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• specifically adopting the reasoning of other case law permitting corporate sponsors to recapture excess assets through amendments to pension plans
• specifically adopting the reasoning of other case law permitting corporate sponsors to recapture excess assets through amendments to pension plans
• “We must honor the presumption that parties to a contract intend every clause to have some effect, and attempt to reconcile ambiguous provisions unless they are ‘irreconcilable.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).