William B. Scheidt and Wanda C. Scheidt v. William Randolph Klein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the applicability of Florida law is not a significant concern in light of the relative simplicity of the legal issues involved in the common law fraud and breach of contract claims”
• finding that the relative simplicity of common law fraud and breach of contract claims under Florida law were not a significant concern in the transfer analysis
• holding Oklahoma federal court applying Florida breach of contract law “not a significant concern”
• acknowledging expert testimony may be admissible even though related to a party or employee of a party
• affirming the district court’s denial of defendant’s § 1404(a) motion because defendant failed to demonstrate inconvenience of documents held at his Florida offices for trial in Oklahoma
• “merely shifting the inconvenience from one side to the other ... obviously is not a permissible justification for a change of venue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).