William B. Richardson v. Dee E. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a private employee, although not a member of any class, had an actionable claim because he alleged discrimination for advocating racial equality in employment
• holding that the Fourteenth Amendment authorizes Congress to reach purely private conduct
• holding that the Fourteenth Amendment authorizes Congress to reach purely private conduct
• holding that the Fourteenth Amendment authorizes Congress to reach purely private conduct
• firing of employee due to his exercise of First Amendment rights held actionable
• white plaintiff fired because he had criticized employers’ racially discriminatory policies held to state a § 1985(3) claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).