Skip to main content
· 3/27/1992

William B. Kaplan v. Merrill Zenner

Citations

  • 956 F.2d 149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that in the case of pleadings, sanctions are “normally ... determined at the end of the litigation” (internal quotation omitted)
  • requiring a Rule 11 motion to be brought “as soon as practicable after discovery of a Rule 11 violation”
  • applying district court’s local rules governing post-judgment motions for bills of costs or attorney’s fees where the request for Rule 11 sanctions was based upon either category
  • stating “[pjrompt filings of motions for sanctions after discovery of an abuse best serve both the systemic and case-specific deterrent functions of Rule 11,” and “reasonableness must serve as the guide” in determining whether a Rule 11 motion was promptly filed
  • “Prompt filings of motions for sanctions after discovery of an abuse best serve both the systemic and case- specific deterrent functions of Rule 11.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Flaum, Engel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.