William B. Howerton v. Kristine Edge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that Nnadika “held that the district court had jurisdiction to consider [the] petition” because the petition did not “directly implicate the order of removal,” as it “point[ed] to no legal error in the final order of removal”
• discussing mootness of a Section 2241 habeas petition in the context of removal
• “[Section 1252(g)] deprives all courts of jurisdiction to review a denial of DACA relief because that decision involves the exercise of prosecutorial discretion not to grant a deferred action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).