Skip to main content
· 1/3/2006

William B. Dockser H. William Willoughby C.R.I., Incorporated v. Martin C. Schwartzberg

Citations

  • 433 F.3d 421
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18
  • 2006 WL 9609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that when \[t]he parties have agreed that arbitrator selection should follow the rules and procedures of the\ AAA, \the number of the arbitrators is a procedural question to be answered exclusively in that forum\
  • concluding the arbitrators had jurisdiction to determine the number of arbitrators that would hear the parties’ dispute
  • noting that, in the face of contractual silence, arbitral resolution of procedural issues is presumed, and \the onus is on the party seeking litigation on a procedural issue to show that the agreement somehow excludes that issue from arbitration\
  • noting that, in the face of contractual silence, arbitral resolution of procedural issues is presumed, and “the onus is on the party seeking litigation on a procedural issue to show that the agreement somehow excludes that issue from arbitration”
  • applying the same logic with respect to the presumption favoring arbitration
  • “[T]he onus is on the party seeking litigation on a procedural issue to show that the agreement somehow excludes that issue from arbitration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Widener, Wilkinson, Traxler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.