William A. Weiler v. Kenneth S. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that substantial evidence supported the ALJ’s decision where the VE identified one occupation with 32,000 available positions
• holding that one appropriate listing constituted substantial evidence
• holding substantial evidence supported ALJ’s decision where one job existed with 32,000 positions
• analyzing the fifth-step determination in terms of (1) whether there was sufficient medical evidence to support the ALJ’s residual functional capacity determination and (2
• affirming ALJ's \not-disabled\ determination where evidence supported one available occupation offering a significant number of jobs
• holding 32,000 jobs nationwide sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).