· 7/28/2020

William A. Reese, Jr. v. Dominick Amari

Syllabus

This is an action to revive a judgment originally entered in 1987 the judgment debtor moved to have the judgment set aside, contending that the judgment was void. The trial court denied the motion and renewed the judgment the judgment debtor appeals. Upon our review, we conclude that the record shows that the debtor answered the complaint but failed to appear at the trial, which proceeded in his absence and led to the judgment consequently, the judgment was valid. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's denial of the motion to set aside the judgment.

Judges: Judge Richard H. Dinkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.