William A. Holbrook v. City of Alpharetta, Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer was not required to accommodate detective’s inability to perform complete investigation of crime scene in the future merely because it had done so in the past
• holding that the ADA did not require a police department to accommodate a disabled detective — who was unable to drive an automobile or collect certain kinds of evidence— with a “minor shuffling of case assignments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).