Willey Appeal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding altering definition within zoning ordinance prior to adoption was not substantial change, as “it did not change a district boundary or classification”
• language added to definition of a permitted use did not require new hearing
• insubstantial change to proposed zoning ordinance did not trigger new notice requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).