Willemijn Houdstermaatschaapij BV v. Apollo Computer Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Appellant failed to demonstrate that the disputed information was protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges where he neither listed the documents he deemed privileged nor corroborated his blanket assertion that the documents were privileged
• explaining “prejudice 10 under these circumstances may simply amount to unfair delay of the final disposition of the 11 matter” where moving party failed to show that separability, juror confusion, or judicial economy 12 factors favored bifurcation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).