Willard v. Town of Lunenburg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in determining whether an adverse inference is warranted, the “‘relevance’ factor” involves not only relevance but also “whether the non-destroying party has suffered prejudice from the destruction of the evidence”
• noting that a party must preserve materials that it reasonably knows or can foresee would be material to a legal or potential legal action
• noting that a party must preserve materials that it reasonably knows or can foresee would be material to a legal or potential legal action
• noting that a party must preserve materials that it reasonably knows or can foresee would be material to a legal or potential legal action
• noting that a party must preserve materials that it reasonably knows or can foresee would be material to a legal or potential legal action (citing Zubulake v. UBS Warburg, LLC, 220 F.R.D. 212, 216 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
• stating “I’m not exactly sure when we [installed the awnings],” and indicating that installation may have occurred in the early morning hours of Thursday, July 25, 2013 or Friday, July 26, 2013

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).