Willard Crimm v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under the substantially identical language of Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(a)(2), the trial court erred in excluding the deposition of the opposing party’s managing agent because the deponent “was to be called later in the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).