Wilks Et Vir v. Manobianco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an insurance agent’s compliance with A.R.S. § 20- 259.01 does not preclude a common law negligence claim against the agent for failure to procure UIM coverage the insured has allegedly requested
• “Under Arizona’s common law, insurance agents owe a duty of reasonable care when obtaining insurance on behalf of their clients.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).