Skip to main content
· 2/7/1920

Wilkins v. Diven

Citations

  • 106 Kan. 283
  • 187 P. 665
  • 1920 Kan. LEXIS 504

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Easement — Access to and Use of Well Water — Equities—Damages— Injunction. In a growing, developing urban community, an implied easement or quasi easement will not be preserved nor reestablished by the aid of an injunction, when the owner of the dominant estate to which the easement was appurtenant is not seriously injured by being deprived of it. He will be remanded to seek legal redress in damages.</p>

Judges: Dawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.