Skip to main content
S.D. Ohio· 12/20/2012

Wilkins v. Daniels

Citations

  • 913 F. Supp. 2d 517
  • 2012 WL 6644465
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that exotic animal ownership implicates a limited property interest such that no fundamental constitutional right is at stake and a rational basis review applies
  • explaining that, for freedom of association purposes, the government does not compel the owner of regulated animals into qualifying for a wild animal act exemption through accreditation merely by providing exemptions for accredited owners
  • noting that any source of property right would derive from state law
  • “A temporary restraining order is an extraordinary remedy whose purpose is to preserve the status quo.”
  • “A temporary restraining order is an extraordinary remedy whose purpose is to preserve the status quo.”
  • analyzing the Ohio Dangerous Wild Animals and Restricted Snakes Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.