Wilkins Ex Rel. United States v. Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the knowledge requirement is “something less than the elements of fraud [found] at common law”
• applying exception to Rule 9(b)'s particularity requirement when facts lie exclusively within the knowledge and control of the moving party
• allowing qui tam relator to plead certain facts on information and belief
• “The Senate Report supports the conclusion that in order to have a ‘reverse false claim,’ the government has to be made aware of the false statement, misrepresentation or misleading omission in some fashion, i.e., there has to be a ‘claim.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).