Wilkie v. Becker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging precedent that courts of equity have upheld “assignments of mere expectancies and possibilities of the future acquisition of the thing assigned” (quotation omitted)
• acknowledging precedent that courts of equity have upheld “assignments of mere expectancies and possibilities of the 7 future acquisition of the thing assigned” (quotation omitted)
• “The general rule is that the right to receive money due or to become due under an existing contract may be assigned even though the contract itself may not be assignable.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).