Wilkey v. Meijer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he jurisdictional bar of” the TIA could not be overcome by mounting a constitutional challenge to the state's tax collection scheme brought under § 1983
• in which it was held that the jurisdictional bar of section 1341 was not avoided by challenging state tax statute on federal grounds
• in which it was held that the jurisdictional bar of section 1341 was not avoided by challenging state tax statute on federal grounds
• “We have held 5 previously that the California refund procedure is a plain, speedy and efficient remedy.”
• in which it was held that the jurisdictional bar of section 1341 was not avoided by challenging state tax statute on federal grounds
• “We have held previously that the California refund procedure is a plain, 22 speedy and efficient remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).