Wilkes v. Polk County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that blanket assertions of privilege before any questions have been asked at a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition are premature
• finding that blanket assertions of privilege before any questions have been asked at a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition are premature
• permitting a 30(b)(6) deposition where Sprint had not established in its briefing that “every relevant piece of information regarding ‘preparing, filing and revising’ Sprint’s Patents” was privileged
• deposition topic of “the preparation and filing” of 25 named patents and amendments reasonably particular
• “In a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, there is no distinction between the corporate representative and the corporation. The Rule 30(b)(6
• “In a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, there is no distinction between the corporate representative and the corporation. The Rule 30(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).