Skip to main content
· 11/18/1964

Wilkes-Barre v. Rubel

Citations

  • 36 Pa. D. & C.2d 797
  • 1964 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • jury's consideration of extraneous facts did not warrant new trial, absent showing of improper motive or influence upon jury
  • jury's consideration of extraneous facts did not warrant new trial, absent showing of improper motive or influence upon jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pinola

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.