Wilkerson v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim of “excusable neglect,” where, inter alia, party “failed to argue that his failure to file timely . . . was due to excusable neglect,” and instead “discusse[d] the more lenient (and irrelevant) standard” applicable to timely motions for extensions of time
• “it is clear that Respondent’s delay in answering his petition would prejudice Petitioner substantially insofar as it would delay this Court’s adjudication of this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).