E.D. Michigan· 7/19/2002

Wilkerson v. Jones

Citations

211 F. Supp. 2d 856
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13330
2002 WL 1710944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting claim of “excusable neglect,” where, inter alia, party “failed to argue that his failure to file timely . . . was due to excusable neglect,” and instead “discusse[d] the more lenient (and irrelevant) standard” applicable to timely motions for extensions of time
“it is clear that Respondent’s delay in answering his petition would prejudice Petitioner substantially insofar as it would delay this Court’s adjudication of this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gadola

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Wilkerson v. Jones

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.