Skip to main content
· 6/30/2004

Wilk v. Wilmorite, Inc.

Citations

  • 812 N.E.2d 765
  • 285 Ill. Dec. 945
  • 349 Ill. App. 3d 880
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that section 2-616(d) should be liberally construed “so that cases are decided on their merits rather than on procedural technicalities” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • noting that section 2-616(d) should be liberally construed \so that cases are decided on their merits rather than on procedural technicalities\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • noting that the failure to file a posttrial motion within 30 days of a final judgment divests the trial court of jurisdiction to modify or vacate the final order
  • “Rule 103(b) further aims to protect defendants from unnecessary delay in the service of process so that they are afforded a fair opportunity to investigate. Thus, Rule 103(b
  • a posttrial motion must be filed within 30 days of a final judgment, and “the trial court will lose jurisdiction to modify or vacate the final order that it entered after the lapse of 30 days”
  • “Under section 2-1203 of the Code, a posttrial motion must be filed within 30 days of a final judgment. [Citation.] Otherwise, the trial court will lose jurisdiction to modify or vacate the final order that it entered after a lapse of 30 days. [Citation.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Byene, Hutchinson, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.