· 6/30/2004
Wilk v. Wilmorite, Inc.
Citations
- 812 N.E.2d 765
- 285 Ill. Dec. 945
- 349 Ill. App. 3d 880
- 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 827
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that section 2-616(d) should be liberally construed “so that cases are decided on their merits rather than on procedural technicalities” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- noting that section 2-616(d) should be liberally construed \so that cases are decided on their merits rather than on procedural technicalities\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- noting that the failure to file a posttrial motion within 30 days of a final judgment divests the trial court of jurisdiction to modify or vacate the final order
- “Rule 103(b) further aims to protect defendants from unnecessary delay in the service of process so that they are afforded a fair opportunity to investigate. Thus, Rule 103(b
- a posttrial motion must be filed within 30 days of a final judgment, and “the trial court will lose jurisdiction to modify or vacate the final order that it entered after the lapse of 30 days”
- “Under section 2-1203 of the Code, a posttrial motion must be filed within 30 days of a final judgment. [Citation.] Otherwise, the trial court will lose jurisdiction to modify or vacate the final order that it entered after a lapse of 30 days. [Citation.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Byene, Hutchinson, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.