Wilhelm v. Louisville Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the ALJ did not err by not including any social limitations in his RFC assessment and his hypothetical question to the VE because he referenced that the claimant “could manage basic work related social interactions with her supervisors and coworkers”
• “[T]he paragraph B criteria, however, does not necessarily translate to a work-related functional limitation for the purposes of the RFC assessment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).