Skip to main content
· 1/6/2000

Wilhelm v. Caldera

Citations

  • 90 F. Supp. 2d 3
  • 90 F. Supp. 3
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231
  • 2000 WL 12889

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no property interest in the plaintiff’s continued practice of medicine in the Army
  • “The relevant language under section 1552 states that the Secretary, acting though the [civilian board], may correct any error or injustice. This language shows that administrative review is possible, but does not show that it is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.