· 1/6/2000
Wilhelm v. Caldera
Citations
- 90 F. Supp. 2d 3
- 90 F. Supp. 3
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231
- 2000 WL 12889
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no property interest in the plaintiff’s continued practice of medicine in the Army
- “The relevant language under section 1552 states that the Secretary, acting though the [civilian board], may correct any error or injustice. This language shows that administrative review is possible, but does not show that it is required.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.