WILFREDO ERAZO - TURCIOS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that convicted inmate was not denied due process 8 when he was placed in a Disciplinary Housing Unit pending a disciplinary hearing
• finding evidence of direct discrimination where plaintiff was told by employer's representative that she would not be hired because she was not \a black male\
• holding Civil Rights Act of 1991 did not apply retroactively
• “New regulations at variance with prior judicial 8 precedents are upheld unless ‘they exceeded the Secretary’s authority [or] are 9 arbitrary and capricious.’”
• “Judicial interpretations ‘change the law’ from (losing) litigants’ perspective, but from the judicial perspective the process of interpretation aims at getting as close as one can to a meaning that predates the litigation.”
• “Judicial interpretations ‘change the law’ from (losing) litigants’ perspective, but from the judicial perspective the process of interpretation aims at getting as close as one can to a meaning that predates the litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).