Wilfred Keyes, and Congress of Hispanic Educators, Plaintiffs/intervenors-Appellees v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• striking portion of consent decree that \does no more than require the district to obey the law\
• “generally, injunctions simply requiring the defendant to obey the law are too vague”
• “[G]enerally, injunctions simply requiring the defendant to obey the law are too vague. Paragraph 4 of the interim decree does no more than require the district to obey the law, and therefore must be stricken.” (citation omitted)
• vacating “obey the law” injunction” in school desegregation case
• referring to the United States’ position as amicus curiae
• Rule 65 (D. Colo. Jan. 20, 2022) (liberally construing pro se pleadings in review of a motion seeking preliminary injunctive relief). 3 To be clear, Plaintiff did dispute that he received a full physical examination in his Supplemental Reply. (See Doc. No. 50 at 1–2.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).