· 11/30/1994
Wiley v. Redd
Citations
- 885 P.2d 592
- 110 Nev. 1310
- 1994 Nev. LEXIS 167
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the Nevada Supreme Court has moved from status-based tort analysis to that of a general duty of reasonable care in the domain of owners and occupiers of land
- holding that no special relationship existed between an alarm company and the police department the company alerted
- recognizing that the Nevada Supreme Court has moved from status-based tort analysis to that of a general duty of reasonable care in the domain of owners and occupiers of land
- explaining a \germ of a relationship\ was insufficient to impose a duty of care upon an alarm company to warn police officers of dangerous dogs on a homeowne?s property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.