Wiley v. Flournoy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “Court of Claims is the predecessor court to this court and a predecessor to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit”
• providing Mr. Burgoyne’s testimony that erosion would not impact structures on properties located “hundreds of feet from any improvements” “for many, many years” (citation omitted)
• finding Mr. Burgoyne’s testimony of no adverse reaction to home values “well-supported and reasonable,” without address- ing the five properties where diminution in value was found
• referring to a finding made in Liability Op., 78 Fed. Cl. at 654−57
• “Plaintiffs carry the burden of proving that a taking has occurred justifying the payment of just compensation.” (quoting Loesch v. United States, 645 F.2d 905, 914 (Ct.Cl.1981) (internal quotations omitted))
• “The composition of the shoreline is significant in this case because it indicates how the shoreline will erode, whether any erosion is permanent[,] and whether it is possible to mitigate any ongoing erosion.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).