Skip to main content
· 7/13/1917

Wile v. Ewing

Citations

  • 67 Pa. Super. 472
  • 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 435

Syllabus

<p>Contract — Action for services as engineer — Evidence—Findings by judge — Trying case without jury.</p> <p>In an action to recover for services as an engineering expert, a judgment for the plaintiff on case tried by the court without a jury will be affirmed, where there is sufficient evidence to sustain a finding that the verbal contract was made with the plaintiff by a third person, who stated to him that defendant was assuming the expense of the initial experiments for a projected corporation; that defendant with knowledge of the services rendered stated that he would give plaintiff a check; that subsequently plaintiff agreed to extend the time of payment; and that defendant did not deny that he owed the bill' until after the suit was brought.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.