Skip to main content
· 5/5/1993

Wildwood Properties v. Archer Vero Beach

Citations

  • 621 So. 2d 691
  • 1993 WL 140137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that fact that other motions, not requiring the presence of appellants, were scheduled for the same day did not cure defect in notice of hearing on motion to strike pleadings
  • affirming a summary judgment because the grounds raised on appeal were not brought to the attention of the trial court in opposition to the summary judgment motion
  • affirming summary judgment \because the grounds now raised were not brought to the attention of the trial court in opposition to the summary judgment\
  • an argument not presented to the trial court in opposition to a motion for summary judgment may not be raised in an appeal of that summary judgment.
  • “A party to be sanctioned for discovery violations must first be given notice and an opportunity to be heard and offer mitigating or extenuating evidence as to why discovery did not take place.”
  • “As to the granting of summary judgment on appellant’s lien foreclosure against appellee, we affirm because the grounds now raised were not brought to the attention of the trial court in opposition to the summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.