Skip to main content
· 8/11/2023

Wilderness Society v. Bureau of Land Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the federal government “does have the power to fix the terms upon which its money allotments to states shall be disbursed”
  • allowing Congress to require federally-funded state governmental entities to adhere to the Hatch Act despite Congress’ inability to regulate local politics
  • allowing Congress to require federally-funded state governmental entities to adhere to the Hatch Act despite Congress' inability to regulate local politics
  • upholding condition withholding highway funds from state when highway official violated Hatch Act’s prohibition against participating in political campaign
  • stating that the Administrative Pro- cedure Act’s (APA’s
  • “The end sought by Congress through the Hatch Act is better public service by requiring those who administer funds for national needs to abstain from active political partisanship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.