Skip to main content
· 10/21/2008

Wilderman v. Powers

Citations

  • 956 A.2d 613
  • 110 Conn. App. 819
  • 2008 Conn. App. LEXIS 484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim that court should not have considered unauthenticated documents in assessing motion for summary judgment is evidentiary in nature
  • claim that court should not have considered unauthenticated documents in assessing motion for summary judgment presents evidentiary issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop, Harper, Hennessy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.