Wilder v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the party’s status as a named beneficiary in an insurance contract does not entitle it “to enforce any and every provision of law or of the insurance contract”
• holding that the party’s status as a named beneficiary in an insurance contract does not entitle it “to enforce any and every provision of law or of the insurance contract”
• noting that one of the purposes of § 627.428 is “to reimburse 21 successful insureds reasonably for their outlays for attorney’s fees ... .”
• rejecting an effort by a third party beneficiary to secure \named beneficiary\ status
• “While the injured party may become a third[-]party beneficiary under the policy, . . . that third party may not automatically invoke all the provisions of the contract or statutes governing the rights and responsibilities flowing between insurer and insured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).