Wilder v. Merit Systems Protection Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the term “current continuous service” means a period of employment or service immediately preceding an adverse action without a break in Federal civilian employment of a workday
• finding that “there is no suggestion” that the definition of current continuous employment in 5 C.F.R. § 752.402 does not apply to section 7511(a)(1)
• finding that “there is no suggestion” that the definition of current continuous employment in 5 C.F.R. § 752.402 does not apply to section 7511(a)(1)
• reaching the same conclusion when the applicable service requirement was 1 year under 5 U.S.C. 711(a)(1)(A)(ii
• finding OPM’s interpretation of § 7511—that “[f]ederal ci- vilian employment” as opposed to military service counts toward “current continuous service”—reasonable and con- sistent with the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2015-07-08· cited 133×
• Hymas v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2016-01-14· cited 65×
• Williams v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-06-11· cited 37×
• Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Lee
  Federal Circuit· 2015-02-26· cited 14×
• Vassallo v. Department of Defense
  Federal Circuit· 2015-08-14· cited 14×
• In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2015-02-04· cited 10×
• Mitchell v. Merit Systems Protection Board
  Federal Circuit· 2014-01-15· cited 9×
• Banks v. Merit Systems Protection Board
  Federal Circuit· 2017-04-18· cited 8×
• Yanko v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2017-09-06· cited 7×
• Harris L. Winns v. United States Postal Service
  Merit Systems Protection Board· 2017-01-04· cited 1×
• Avalos v. Hud
  Federal Circuit· 2020-06-26

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
• United States v. Mead Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 3,086×
• 55 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1675, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,952 Julio M. Cruz v. Department of the Navy
  Federal Circuit· 1991-04-30· cited 194×
• Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2009-04-01· cited 182×
• John P. Bosley v. Merit Systems Protection Board
  Federal Circuit· 1998-12-14· cited 117×
• Nicholas C. Synan v. Merit Systems Protection Board
  Federal Circuit· 1985-06-21· cited 99×
• Anthony Meglio v. Merit Systems Protection Board
  Federal Circuit· 1984-10-10· cited 57×
• Johnny Granado, Jr. v. Department of Justice
  Federal Circuit· 1983-11-16· cited 11×
• Carrow v. Merit Systems Protection Board
  Federal Circuit· 2009-05-01· cited 10×
• James Collins v. Merit Systems Protection Board
  Federal Circuit· 1992-10-20· cited 5×