Wilder v. Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we can take judicial notice of the filings in district court
• holding Dow “has no interest in the method of distributing the aggregate damages award among the class members” and rejecting Dow’s argument that a jury must determine which class members suffered less or no injury
• refusing to reverse district court based on the defendants’ argument that the plaintiffs’ expert moved the class period start date to maximize damages
• finding no abuse of discretion for the admission of statistical evidence where the methodology used was acceptable but there were questions about how the underlying data was calculated
• taking judicial notice of the briefs filed in district court when omitted from the appellate appendix
• explaining the expert’s benchmarks in Comcast became \useless\ upon a ruling that three of the liability theories could not be used

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).