Wilder v. Bernstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since the [c]ourt finds the [stipulation] to be unambiguous in its terms, no evidentiary hearing is necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tronox Inc. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2017-04-20· cited 101×
• Marisol A. v. Giuliani
  S.D. New York· 1999-03-31· cited 18×
• Wilder v. Bernstein
  Second Circuit· 1995-02-23· cited 8×
• Brill v. Wing
  N.D. New York· 1996-08-13· cited 1×