Wildearth Guardians v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that BLM sufficiently examined the cumulative impact of a proposed lease sale where it quantified the GHG emissions from the leased parcels and compared them to state-wide and nation-wide emissions
• holding that BLM sufficiently examined the cumulative impact of a proposed lease sale where it quantified the GHG emissions from the leased parcels and compared them to state-wide and nation-wide emissions
• concluding that agency's \analysis complies with the 'rule of reason' in light of the information available to the agency\ where it \candidly disclosed that no appropriate model exists to accurately predict\ specific impact raised by plaintiffs and \instead relied on available modeling data\
• concluding that agency’s “analysis complies with the ‘rule of reason’ in light of the information available to the agency” where it “candidly disclosed that no appropriate model exists to accurately predict” specific impact raised by plaintiffs and “instead relied on available modeling data”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).