WildEarth Guardians v. Public Service Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] broad request for ‘other’ relief cannot save [a] complaint” from mootness
• noting that plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief is moot because their “wish [came] true” when defendants were no longer engaged in the complained-of conduct
• noting that the plaintiff’s Clean Air Act civil penalties claim was moot in part because the defendant did not have a “history or pattern” of violations, and the particular violation alleged was unlikely to be repeated.
• finding the plaintiff's claim for a beneficial mitigation project moot, but acknowledging a project could provide redress if it conferred a direct benefit on the plaintiff's members or \could deter [the defendant] from future violations\
• “[W]ithout a live, concrete controversy, [a court] lack[s] jurisdiction to consider claims no matter how meritorious.”
• “[W]ithout a live, concrete controversy, we lack jurisdiction to consider claims no matter how meritorious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).