Wilcox v. Stratton Lumber, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that thirty-five hours spent by two attorneys on response to summary judgment motion in a Title VII case as excessive
• concluding that ten hours spent on only deposition preparation as excessive and “over preparation”
• concluding that “35 hours preparing [a] response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment” was 16 “significantly more time on [that] individual task[ ] than [was] merited”
• noting that costs are “out-of-pocket expenses of the type an attorney would normally pass on to a client.”
• finding that several undetailed and unrealistic entries were indicative of excessive billing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).