Wilcox v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Patently, one cannot be convicted of possession with intent to sell under section 893.13(l)(a) if all the elements of possession are not met.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-05· cited 11×
• Ewing v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-25· cited 2×
• Murphy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-04· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Abreau
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-05-26· cited 198×
• Amado v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-09-05· cited 60×
• Rogers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-17· cited 7×
• St. Fabre v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-06· cited 7×
• Payton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-03· cited 1×