Skip to main content
· 2/2/1996

Wilcox v. Geneva Rock Corp.

Citations

  • 911 P.2d 367
  • 283 Utah Adv. Rep. 9
  • 1996 Utah LEXIS 30
  • 1996 WL 50781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting Rule 15(a) “consistently with the liberal pleading practices mandated by rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”
  • permitting an amendment to a complaint that incorrectly named “Geneva Rock Co.,” rather than “Geneva Rock Products, Inc.,” where the summons correctly listed the company name and the vice president was properly served
  • “ ‘If the body of the complaint correctly identifies the party ... courts generally will allow an amendment under Rule 15 to correct technical defects in the caption.’ ”
  • “When the statute of limitations has expired before an amendment to a pleading is made, the amendment must relate back to the date of the original complaint if the amendment is to be effective.”
  • “ ‘[A]n amendment which substitutes or adds new parties ... relat[es] back, as to both plaintiff and defendant, when new and old parties have an identity of interest; so it can be assumed or proved the relation back is not prejudicial.”'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howe, Zimmerman, Stewart, Durham, Russon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.