· 2/2/1996
Wilcox v. Geneva Rock Corp.
Citations
- 911 P.2d 367
- 283 Utah Adv. Rep. 9
- 1996 Utah LEXIS 30
- 1996 WL 50781
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting Rule 15(a) “consistently with the liberal pleading practices mandated by rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”
- permitting an amendment to a complaint that incorrectly named “Geneva Rock Co.,” rather than “Geneva Rock Products, Inc.,” where the summons correctly listed the company name and the vice president was properly served
- “ ‘If the body of the complaint correctly identifies the party ... courts generally will allow an amendment under Rule 15 to correct technical defects in the caption.’ ”
- “When the statute of limitations has expired before an amendment to a pleading is made, the amendment must relate back to the date of the original complaint if the amendment is to be effective.”
- “ ‘[A]n amendment which substitutes or adds new parties ... relat[es] back, as to both plaintiff and defendant, when new and old parties have an identity of interest; so it can be assumed or proved the relation back is not prejudicial.”'
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howe, Zimmerman, Stewart, Durham, Russon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.