Wilburn v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts will presume public officers have properly discharged their official duties
• applying the presumption of regularity to conclude the ALJ discharged his official duties as described
• applying the presumption of regularity to conclude the ALJ discharged his official duties as described
• presuming an ALJ “properly discharged his official duties and did in fact review” the materials he said he would review
• applying the presumption of regularity to conclude the ALJ discharged his official duties as described
• applying the presumption of regularity to conclude the ALJ discharged his official duties as described

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).