Wilbur v. Bowditch Mutual Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Prieto-Rubio “endors[ed] the conclusion and reasoning of the Cobb dissent”
• stating its conclusion that “police were not required to pro- vide notice to the attorney representing defendant on the pending charges before inquiring about his new, uncharged and ongoing conspiracy to illegally undermine the pending charges” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).