Wilbourn v. Stennett, Wilkinson & Ward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the non-movant’s “claim must be supported by more than a mere scintilla of colorable evidence”
• citing. Galloway v. Travelers Ins. Co., 515 So.2d 678, 683 (Miss.1987) (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986))
• discussing the elements that a plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence to recover in a legal-malpractice case
• \The client cannot hold the right in reserve for tactical purposes until it would be most helpful to his position. Failure to move for disqualification at the earliest practical opportunity will constitute a waiver.\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).