Skip to main content

Wilbourn v. Stennett, Wilkinson & Ward

Citations

  • 687 So. 2d 1205
  • 1996 WL 711315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the non-movant’s “claim must be supported by more than a mere scintilla of colorable evidence”
  • citing. Galloway v. Travelers Ins. Co., 515 So.2d 678, 683 (Miss.1987) (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986))
  • discussing the elements that a plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence to recover in a legal-malpractice case
  • \The client cannot hold the right in reserve for tactical purposes until it would be most helpful to his position. Failure to move for disqualification at the earliest practical opportunity will constitute a waiver.\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan Lee, C

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.