Wilbert v. Michel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that ALJ’s decision incorporating opinion from source rendered before surgeries and before condition worsened was not based on substantial evidence
• concluding that ALJ’s decision incorporating opinion from source rendered before surgeries and before condition worsened was not based on substantial evidence
• holding that the ALJ’s RFC determination based solely on a stale medical opinion, rendered before the plaintiff's surgery, was unsupported by substantial evidence
• concluding that ALJ’s decision incorporating opinion from source rendered before surgeries and before condition worsened was not based on substantial evidence
• holding independent medical examination relied upon by the ALJ was stale where it was rendered nearly five years before the ALJ’s decision and before the claimant’s knee condition deteriorated because of a fall which led to two surgeries.
• remanding where ALJ relied on medical opinion \rendered nearly five years before the ALJ's decision\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).