· 4/17/1997
Wilbert ESSEX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 111 F.3d 1304
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7610
- 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,642
- 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 427
- 1997 WL 186475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- proceeding to the dispositive issue of pretext without deciding if the plaintiff established a prima facie case
- “Plaintiffs cannot create issues of fact by pointing to the ambiguity of their own evidence.”
- “The fact that the employer was mistaken or based its decision on bad policy, or even just plain stupidity, goes nowhere as evidence that the proffered reason is pretextual.”
- “The fact that the employer was mistaken or based its decision on bad policy, or even just plain stupidity, goes nowhere as evidence that the proffered explanation is pretextual.”
- “The fact that the employer was mistaken or based its decision on bad policy, or even just plain stupidity, goes nowhere as evidence that the proffered explanation is pretextual.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eschbach, Easterbrook, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.