Skip to main content
· 4/17/1997

Wilbert ESSEX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 111 F.3d 1304
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7610
  • 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,642
  • 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 427
  • 1997 WL 186475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • proceeding to the dispositive issue of pretext without deciding if the plaintiff established a prima facie case
  • “Plaintiffs cannot create issues of fact by pointing to the ambiguity of their own evidence.”
  • “The fact that the employer was mistaken or based its decision on bad policy, or even just plain stupidity, goes nowhere as evidence that the proffered reason is pretextual.”
  • “The fact that the employer was mistaken or based its decision on bad policy, or even just plain stupidity, goes nowhere as evidence that the proffered explanation is pretextual.”
  • “The fact that the employer was mistaken or based its decision on bad policy, or even just plain stupidity, goes nowhere as evidence that the proffered explanation is pretextual.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eschbach, Easterbrook, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.