Skip to main content
· 10/5/1999

Wilbert E. Hollins v. Department of Corrections of the State of Florida

Citations

  • 191 F.3d 1324
  • 44 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 695
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24656
  • 1999 WL 791444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the unique circumstances doctrine when counsel relied on PACER system’s version of a docket sheet, which failed to show the entry of final judgment
  • habeas counsel’s reliance on court’s computerized docket information sheet constituted unique circum- stance when final judgment was never shown on the system

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Dubina, Carnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.